"The established plan of depriving the interests of the people, blessings and the end of the contract, subverting the foundations of the constitution and depriving them of all the shares in the formulation and enforcement of the law, from
Will defend the revolution. from
"John Adams, Novanglus Paper, 1774
I just support it in the morning.
Let LENDER accept my house?
Initially we had twelve people working as a group to loose work and then sharing this knowledge. We were then operating like a club member with similar interests. Although we learn much faster than any borrower, each of us is representing ourselves through the court. Is this wrong? Will we lose? For the past seven years, I have felt confident and anxious at different times. However, our members have won seven cases in the past eight months, so the answer is yes, yes, this is possible. In fact, I am doing it full time. In some strange but good ways, I think this is my civic responsibility.
I have been sitting in court and heard many judges telling the borrowers that they are trying to call themselves Pros parties, they "need to find a lawyer." Almost all customers over seven years think that because the judge told them that this is the law. It is not. However, judges generally believe that the borrower has a better chance to have his story represented by a qualified lawyer. Overall, this is a good suggestion. However, today's judges have missed some details about the new type of fraud, which was not discovered until around 1999, which may make it possible for a lawyer to lose your family's home.
The borrower is currently unable to afford the lawyer's fees. In addition, even if you know the mortgage finance law, there are almost no lawyers. There is not enough room to elaborate, but it's easy to see if you are lucky enough to meet someone who knows what has changed in the relationship between lawyers and judges over the years. I hope someone will tell me in 2011.
In fact, if it is a fraudulent foreclosure, why does the borrower have to lose his or her house because they are unable to hire a lawyer? They are victims of crime. They are not criminals.
So if you are a borrower threatened by foreclosure, the problem is, if you can't find a good lawyer, even if you can't pay him or her, you just give up the biggest you will have. The most expensive property? Maybe. But, I said no. Every day I know more than I did the day before. On this topic, I am an expert.
I have blown the "impossible" lender of the entire problem behind the court and steal the house without a "very serious" loan to the borrower. Yes, back to the real world [before 1994], it's all very simple.
You borrowed from a banker you know. You have signed a promissory note detailing the amount you owe and the payment terms you agree to. Bankers need to know that if you can't pay, the bank won't lose the money they lend to you, then you will use the house you bought as collateral. The document you signed that contains the terms that you and the bank agree to is called a security tool. In states that use judicial foreclosure rules, the mortgage instrument is called a mortgage. In states that use non-judicial foreclosure rules, security tools are called trust deeds, and in these states there are not even any mortgages. Because we all use the term mortgage to represent our confused home loan. The foreclosure party is counting on you to be confused with the judge. [I covered this more fully in another article].
These documents and agreed terms are now your home loan. The promissory note is crucial to the transaction and it is the most important document you sign. You made these fair monthly payments. You and the banker keep track of payments, and when your loan is paid off, the promissory note is marked as paid and returned to you. The original promissory note has been returned to you. Each. You can trust the financial industry to do this. But for any borrower, lawyer or judge born around 1980, this sounds like fantasy, because following the laws and regulations on banking since 1995 is not a positive idea [when Microsoft first offered free electronics] When the mail is] light speed].
However, because few borrowers know about any of their rights, and because these equally distorted financiers have ruined the world's economy, few borrowers can claim $5,000 for a lawyer and tell them their rights. The vast majority of borrowers who were mistakenly collateralized just told their children that they had to change schools. They rented a truck they could not afford to go to their unapproved rental house or apartment because it was not only fake. The foreclosures illegally took home and they also reported foreclosures to credit rating companies, which has ruined their credit.
Guys, this is not the United States I grew up with!
I intend to insist on telling the victims borrowers that not everyone must be so fast. There is no reason for a "bank" that threatens foreclosure. This "foreclosure party" can't, and they won't show real evidence of the transaction, prove that they are even the real party you owe. That's because they are not the one you owe.
But if you don't stop turning and fighting, they will escape it. Your situation is very good, you still don't know.
I do it this way. I am trying to be a person who can tell you why you don't just want to help you fight back. I am a long-term real estate agent, real estate developer, home builder, mortgage broker and very large real estate trading consultant across the country. I should be a really smart person, do you know?
Yes, GMAC mortgages stole my house, which made me angry. Really crazy. Since November 11, 2011, I have been crazy all the time. But I didn't rent a truck. I bought it back. But like many Americans in all professions, the economy has seriously damaged my income, so I can't afford a lawyer. At that time, I realized that I must have a lawyer.
I have now paused my own house in court for seven years, while dealing with the most arrogant lies of lawyers in court, and not anyone I never thought of would tell them unscrupulously [or stupidly]. Fortunately, I now know why I can stick to it, and if I stay together, I will win. Any different explanations about today are too long for this article, but I think I will make these seven years worthwhile soon.
Ok, so I have described a lot of questions above [of course not detailed], how borrowers try to protect their homes without money or information to hire a lawyer.
The answer is to do Pro Se. Pro Se means "I represent myself."
This first sounds impossible to be daunting. Everyone I have talked to with me is very difficult to think about. However, this is possible. This is legal. In fact, this is your constitutional right.
First, you need information. What is wrong with your "lender"? Are you doing the right thing? How can I find a way through the court system? You can't lie. You must really know what the truth is and what happened. If we try to deceive the court with misleading speech, we don't look much better than the people we oppose. If used properly, the facts are very powerful weapons.
The person who threatens to foreclosure is not the entity that funds your loan. You won't claim that you didn't get a loan because you did it. However, it is not the lender mentioned in the loan document. It comes from an unknown source in an illegal way. [Ride along with that idea, you can understand what I mean later].
This means that anyone you think you have closed has no right to collect money from you or to transfer a loan to another entity. Therefore, your loan cannot be sold. The seller and the buyer of your promissory note cannot sign a contract and transfer your loan through sales because the seller has no interest [ownership] on the sale of your loan.
However, if you don't protest in court, they will ask your loan to be sold, and now an Imposter / Fictitious Payee [the true regulatory terms of all 50 states] will steal your home. If the statement they made is not true, but you do not object, then the judge must treat the lies as truth. When looking at borrowers in court, or reading motivations and answers in their cases, I have been plagued by the extent to which borrowers think they can object. Oops, what did Perry Mason do? object. What did Barnaby Jones do? object. What did Captain Kirk do to the Boston Law Department? Yes, he looks forward to a long, loud voice. The court is not a church. You should be professional, but you have the right to express your opinion.
The way you start bringing the case to court is to file a lawsuit [for home loan fraud, quiet headline action is common, but today we have better things. Or wait. Do this with what the lawyer wanted before.] Comparison.
You are now the plaintiff and no longer the defendant. You won't go to court for a while, but you must ask for your rights and claim that the party with the right foreclosure will try to stop your lies. However, by using the motion of the appropriate law, rather than immediately in front of the judges in the court, this is a piece of paper. It may never be, this is what we have won 5 times recently. This is my belief, because we stayed and decided with the foreclosure party to pick someone who has the power of knowledge.
We can organize your documents and develop a strategy to prove that you have not received funding from Imposer Lender, and these funds are claiming that you have done so. ...
Orignal From: I can't help a lawyer help me mortgage a mortgage loan
No comments:
Post a Comment